@ Tuesday, Jun. 30, 2015 – 16:45:34
@ Tuesday, Jun. 30, 2015 – 16:22:00
@ Tuesday, Jun. 30, 2015 – 15:41:46
The liars, nonces and abusers,eh ?
@ Tuesday, Jun. 30, 2015 – 15:21:51
Professor #AdamFairclough #Leiden #AmericanHistory
#AlisonGelfand of #Merrick
You were just thinking of yourselves tut.
@ Tuesday, Jun. 30, 2015 – 12:03:44
British author, Chris Everard, has exposed yet another Hampstead school which concealed an active Pedo-ring since the 1970s - this ring of bastards not only bedded young boys, but bussed them up and down Britain where they worked like unpaid slaves delivering leaflets which were promoting LORD JANNER - he invited the Pedo teachers to bring boys to Parliament - Janner's own son was educated at the UCS in Hampstead, whose nursery school is called 'The Phoenix' and is a school which has a 'Statutory Ban on all Religion'.
A British author, brother to the well known WILL SELF, has published a book in which a whole chapter is dedicated to exposing the PHOENIX SCHOOL for nursery & primary schoolboys in Hampstead. The Phoenix UCS school is – just like the Hampstead Whistleblower kids claimed – is yet another nursery/primary school in which teachers formed a sex abuse pedo-ring and systematically had sex with the pupils. The UCS Phoenix School is round the corner from Lord Janner's home who himself is now being put on trial reluctantly by the British Government for sex crimes against children.
The Hampstead Whistleblower kids clearly told Barnet Police in September 2014 ‘that other schools are involved in having sex with children' – and we now have corroborative evidence of this…
The UCS Phoenix School and its adjacent primary school are a member of the Eton Group – the place where our present-day Prime Minister and many of his fellow buddies from the Bullingdon Club were educated. The UCS Phoenix School maintains affiliated links with a number of other schools in north and west London, including South Hampstead High School and Westminster Academy. It also has strong ties with Equatorial College School in Uganda – and – if you remember, the Hampstead WHistleblower kids claimed that babies from third world countries were shipped in TNT and DHL boxes to Hampstead for the abusive ritual sacrifices which were performed on a regular basis.
The details of the pedo-ring at UCS are difficult to obtain because school records were destroyed by fire or left to rot by a headmaster, C.S. Walton who believed "that tradition began with him”.
The ‘tradition' of the UCS is that there is a statutory ban on all religion – something which, in a Christian country – would most probably be of interest to Satanists.
LORD JANNER was elected to parliament in 1970 - mainly due to the efforts of schoolboys who delivered leaflets for his parliamentary campaign. Pedo teachers bussed kids to Janner's office. Janner is former director of the board for British Jews. His disgusting 40+year career as a pedophile has been covered-up by the Crown Prosecution Service, and even the Police admit that they have had sufficient evidence to bust Janner many times over since the 1980s.
Originally, there were no compulsory subjects and no rigid form system. Most boys learnt Latin and many learnt German – Latin is the official language of Vatican City which has paid $1billion in settlement claims for pedo sex crimes, and German – which also has a Jewish dialect known as Yiddish – was a most rare and unusual language subject to teach boys in London at the time – just up the road there is a German-Yiddish community, and many of the pupils came from families who preferred their children to be taught in a ‘non-religious' environment). There was no religious teaching.
Lord Janner is linked to the UCS Hampstead paedophile ring through his son: We now know for sure that at least four paedophile teachers abused boys at University College School, led by politics teacher Michael Densham. The son of Lord Janner attended the school along with other famous alumni who include executives at the Newsnight BBC TV programme – this is the show which censored and suppressed the expose about Jimmy Savile. Are you now begining to see the light?
Former pupils are known as ‘Old Gowers', and there is a statutory ban on religious education and a refusal to acknowledge, in any formal way, differences of ethnic or cultural background.
The roster of pupils have included the offspring of many Labour grandees, including both sons of the party's former Prime Minister, Harold Wilson.
UCS educated Tristram Hunt, the son of a Labour peer (and now Shadow Education Secretary), Jonathan Freedland, the Left-wing commentator, and Ian Katz, a former Guardian journalist who is the new editor of BBC2's Newsnight.
The UCS staff room was home to AT LEAST four paedophile teachers, which were sensationally exposed in 2004 by the writer and entrepreneur Jonathan Self, who had attended the school with his brother, Will, the novelist. In an autobiography titled Self Abuse, Jonathan revealed that he had ‘suffered repeated sexual abuse by two of the masters at UCS senior school for most of the three years I spent there'. He said it began on a school trip when he was ‘barely 13 years old' and a teacher plied him with alcohol until he was ‘vomiting drunk'. Of course, this is identical to what the Hampstead children have been alleging regarding their father – who they claim gave them alcohol and also powder drugs to snort – but the police failed utterly to ask the father even one simple question about these allegations.
‘He begged me to take off all my clothes and get into bed with him,' Self recalled. ‘What started as, effectively, a rape continued much in the manner of an illicit affair.' The teacher, then in his 30s, would typically take his victim to ‘restaurants, pubs and a gay club in the Finchley Road', before ending their liaisons by forcing him to have sex in his car (‘short and hurried') or in a bedroom of his home in Ealing, ‘a drawn-out business' Self found ‘abhorrent'.
Over the course of the abusive relationship, Self says that Densham introduced him to several other paedophiles connected to UCS, including former pupil Basil Moss, who ‘was always kissing me and pinching my bottom', and two teachers from the UCS junior school ‘who made a similar nuisance of themselves'. This evidence proves that former pupils, once groomed and placed into society, then become abusers in their own right.
Self was then raped by yet another professional associate of Densham's called Tony Ford, a UCS art teacher, who ‘became so insistent I have sex with him that in the end I gave in'. ‘I wouldn't keep harassing you,' Self recalled Ford saying on the day he finally consented. ‘But I know you have done it with Mike and it just isn't fair that you won't do it with me.'
BBC NewsNight covered up the Jimmy Savile scandal – and now has a new boss – a newspaper editor called IAN KATZ who does not come from the world of television.
This troubling saga generated a smattering of ugly headlines when Self's book was published, just over a decade ago. Yet, perhaps due to the fact that Densham and Ford were no longer around (one disappeared, one committed suicide, in murky circumstances) no proper police investigation was conducted. That's right – unlike the celebrity arrests of Rolf Harris and Stuart Hall – it seems that the leafy suburban streets of Hampstead are a haven for pedo cults who have PROTECTION FROM PROSECUTION.
Lord Greville Janner will now be placed on trial [though not personally] via a kangaroo court which has been set up because of the successful Social Media campaign led by Chris Everard and the Hampstead bloggers…
Janner is a multi millionaire 86-year-old peer, who is described as a flamboyant ‘amateur magician' and was ennobled by Tony Blair. Indeed, Blair himself has come under the spotlight of an anonymous smear campaign to induce the public to look into a criminal conviction for public lewd ‘cottaging' by a man who has Tony Blair's middle names – the memes circulating on Facebook suggest that this man was indeed Blair himself.
Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders announced in April that the police had sufficient evidence to charge Lord Janner with 22 paedophile offences, including 16 indecent assaults and six acts of buggery. She added, however, that Lord Janner would not face trial on a single one of the charges, involving nine separate children from 1969 to 1988, on the grounds that he is suffering ‘dementia'. No proof of this dementia and no doctor has come forward to corroborate these claims. WHat is more, just as we see with the UCS pedo ring – the POLICE HAVE DELIBERATELY FAILED TO INVESTIGATE AND TAKE ACTION WHICH WILL LEAD TO A PROSECUTION.
Hampstead: Head of the Snake is just one of many documentaries now screening on THE ENIGMA CHANNEL which reveal that similar Satanic pedo cults in the USA and Australia have existed for decades – Sign-up for a viewing account and enjoy being part of a global audience who enjoy uncensored documentaries in multiple languages – click here http://www.enigmatv.com/the_enigma_channel/Sign_Up.html
@ Tuesday, Jun. 30, 2015 – 11:32:28
What is wrong with this country and its public servants ?
My partner and I have been told 'no - not possible' for months now.
Last friday, we threatened solicitors and by monday we are told 'yes - of course'.
Is this how the country works now ?
People are told lies...until the writ hits their desks.
If anyone else tells me their sorry grrr.
@ Monday, Jun. 29, 2015 – 18:39:45
Sunday afternoon was spent wielding a pickaxe and a sledgehammer at a pile of concrete in a friends garden.
It was dirty, tiring and a little painful.
My soft hands blistered.
My back and shoulders ached and my pectoral muscles whined in disbelief.
Two hours later the pile was either bagged or in the car to be taken to the tip.
A job well done.
Today, my shoulders are screaming and my back...shudder.
I hate cement.
@ Sunday, Jun. 28, 2015 – 12:04:42
In an interview with the French TV station LCP, former French minister for Foreign Affairs Roland Dumas said:
‘' I'm going to tell you something. I was in England two years before the violence in Syria on other business. I met with top British officials, who confessed to me that they were preparing something in Syria.
This was in Britain not in America. Britain was organizing an invasion of rebels into Syria. They even asked me, although I was no longer minister for foreign affairs, if I would like to participate.
Naturally, I refused, I said I'm French, that doesn't interest me.''
Dumas went on give the audience a quick lesson on the real reason for the war that has now claimed the lives of tens of thousands of people.
‘'This operation goes way back. It was prepared, preconceived and planned… in the region it is important to know that this Syrian regime has a very anti-Israeli stance.
Consequently, everything that moves in the region- and I have this from the former Israeli prime minister who told me ‘we'll try to get on with our neighbours but those who don't agree with us will be destroyed.
It's a type of politics, a view of history, why not after all. But one should know about it.''
Dumas is a retired French foreign minister who is obliged to use discretion when revealing secrets which could affect French foreign policy. That is why he made the statement ‘I am French, that doesn't interest me'. He could not reveal France's role in the British plan as he would be exposing himself to prosecution for revealing state secrets.
There have been many disinformation agents in the British and French press, many of them well known ‘leftist' war correspondents and commentators, who have tried to pretend that Israel secretly supports Assad. Those who make such arguments are either stupid, ignorant or deliberate disinformation agents of NATO and Israel.
Israel's support for Al Qaeda militants in Syria has even been admitted by the mainstream press. For example, Germany's Die Welt newspaper published a report on June 12th on Israel's medical treatment of the Al Qaeda fighters.
Israel planned this war of annihilation years ago in accordance with the Yinon Plan, which advocates balkanization of all states that pose a threat to Israel. The Zionist entity is using Britain and France to goad the reluctant Obama administration into sending more American troops to their death in Syria on behalf of Tel Aviv.
Of all the aggressor states against Syria, Israel has been the quietest from the start. That is because Laurent Fabius, Francois Holland, William Hague and David Cameron are doing their bidding by attempting to drag Israel's American Leviathan into another ruinous war so that Israel can get control of the Middle East's energy reserves, eventually replacing the United States as the ruling state in the world. It has also been necessary for Tel Aviv to remain silent so as not to expose their role in the ‘revolutions', given the fact that the Jihadist fanatics don't realize they are fighting for Israel.
This is the ideology of Zionism which cares no more for Jews than it does for its perceived enemies. The Jewish colony is determined to become a ruling state in the Middle East in the insane delusion that this will enable it to replace the United States as a global hegemon, once the US collapses fighting Israel's wars.
Israeli Prime Minister once told American talk show host Bill Maher that the reason why Israel always wins short conflicts, while the United States gets bogged down in endless wars. ‘' The secret is that we have America'', he said.
But Israel is itself slowly collapsing. If one excludes the enslaved Palestinian population, the Jewish state still has the highest level of poverty in the developed world with more and more Jews choosing to leave the ‘promised' land, a garrison state led by mad men, an anti-Semitic entity threatening to engulf the world in war and destruction. Israel cares no more about its own working class Jews than any other ethnic community.
In fact, if the Likudnik crooks running the Israeli colony get their way, working class Israelis will be among the first to pay as they are conscripted to fight terrorists created by their own government. With orthodox Jews protesting in the streets of New York against Israel and Haredi Jewish minority opposing Israel's rampant militarism, Zionism is coming under increased attack from Jewish religious authorities and non-Zionist Jews both inside and outside of the occupied territories.
This is not the first time that Roland Dumas has spoken out against wars of aggression waged by successive French regimes. In 2011 he revealed that he had been asked by the United States when he was foreign minister in the Mitterrand administration to organize the bombing of Libya. On that occasion the French refused to cooperate. Dumas, a lawyer by profession, offered to defend Colonel Gaddafi, at the International Criminal Court in the event of his arrest by Nato.
Dumas was also vocal in condemning France's brutal neo-colonial bombing of the Ivory Coast earlier in 2011, were death squads and terrorists similar to those later deployed in Libya and Syria were unleashed upon the Ivoirian population in order to install a IMF puppet dictator Alassane Quattara in power. Gbagbo was described as one of the greatest African leaders of the past 20 years by Jean Ziegler, sociologist and former member of the Advisory Committee of the UN Human Rights Council.
Gbagbo had plans to nationalize banks and wrest control of the country's currency from the colonial finance institutions in Paris. He also wanted to roll back many of the worst effects of IMF restructuring by nationalizing industries and creating a functioning, universal free health service. All of this threatened the interests of French corporations in the former French colony. So, the Parisian oligarchy went to work to find a suitable replacement as caretaker of their Ivoirian colony.
They sent in armed terrorist gangs, or ‘rebel's in the doublespeak of imperialism, who murdered all before them while the French media blamed president Gbagbo for the violence that ensued. Gbagbo and Gaddafi had opposed Africom, the Pentagon's plan to recolonize Africa. That was another reason for the 2011 bombing of their two African countries.
The formula is always the same. Imperialism backs ‘rebels', whenever its interests are threatened by regimes that love their country more than foreign corporations. One should not forgot that during the Spanish Civil War of 1936, General Franco and his cronies were also ‘rebels' and they, like their counterparts in Libya in 2011, were bombed to power by foreign powers, replacing a progressive, republican administration with fascism.
There are pro-Israeli fanatics in France who have used the analogy of the Spanish Civil War as justification for intervention in Libya and Syria. The pseudo-philosopher Henry Bernard Levy is one of them. Of course, the ignoramus Levy doesn't realize that the reason France, England and the USA did not officially intervene in the Spanish Civil War is because they were covertly helping the ‘rebels' from the start. They enabled arms shipments to the Francoist ‘rebels' while preventing arms deliveries to the Spanish government, who, like Syria today, were helped by Moscow. Anyone who has studied the Spanish Civil War knows that all the imperialist countries wanted Franco as a bulwark against communism.
There is nothing imperialism loves more than a rebel without a cause. What imperialism hates, however, are revolutionaries. That is why the ‘rebels' which imperialism sends into other countries to colonize them on behalf of foreign banks and corporations, have to be marketed as ‘revolutionaries' in order to assure the support of the Monty Python brigade of petty-bourgeois, ‘ leftist' dupes such as Democracy Now! and their ilk.
Dumas is not the only top French official to denounce the New World Order. Former French ambassador to Syria Michel Raimbaud wrote a book in 2012 entitled ‘Le Soudan dans tous les états', where he revealed how Israel planned and instigated a civil war in South Sudan in order to balkanize a country led by a pro-Palestinian government. He also exposed the pro-Israeli media groups and ‘human rights' NGOS who created the ‘humanitarian' narrative calling for military intervention by the United States in the conflict.
The subject was covered extensively by African investigative journalist Charles Onana in his 2009 book, Al-Bashir & Darfour LA CONTRE ENQUÊTE.
There are many more retired French officials who are speaking out about the ruinous policies of this French government, including the former head of French domestic intelligence Yves Bonnet. There have also been reports of dissent in the French armed forces and intelligence apparatus.
After the assassination of Colonel Gaddafi in October 2011, the former French ambassador to Libya Christian Graeff told French radio station France Culture that it was responsible for the diffusion of lies and war propaganda on behalf of Nato throughout the war. Graeff also warned the broadcasters that such disinformation could only work on the minds of serfs but not in a country of free minds.
The power of the Israeli lobby in France is a subject rarely discussed in polite circles. In France there is a law against questioning or denial of the holocaust. However, denial of the Korean holocaust, Guatemalan holocaust, Palestinian holocaust, Indonesian holocaust and the dozens of other US/Israeli supported genocides is not only perfectly legal but is the respectable norm.
The same lobby which introduced the Loi Gayssot in 1990, effectively ending freedom of expression in France, would also like to ban any independent investigations of genocides whose narratives they have written, such as the Rwanda genocide, where Israel played a key role in supporting the ‘rebels' led by Paul Kagame, who invaded Rwanda from Uganda from 1991 to 1994, leading to the genocide of both Tutus and Tutsis. Many serious scholars have written about the Rwandan genocide, which the Israel lobby repeatedly uses as a case study to justify ‘humanitarian' intervention by Western powers. The Zionist thought police would like to see such authors prosecuted for ‘negating' imperialism's disgusting lies on African conflicts.
Now, the Israeli Lobby is forcing the (their) French government to prosecute twitter messages which the lobby deems ‘anti-Semitic'. This is one further step towards the creation of a totalitarian state where any criticism of imperialism, foreign wars, racism, oppression, perhaps eventually capitalism itself could fall under the rubric of ‘anti-Semitism'.
These people are sick, and those who cow down to them are sicker. Perhaps the etymology of sickness, a word cognate with the German Sicherheit (security) according to dictionary.com, is not a coincidence. For what is particularly sick about our society is the cult of security, endless surveillance, ubiquitous cameras, the cult of the all seeing eye, the prurient gaze as part of the incessant discourse on terrorism by those who specialize in the training of the very terrorists they claim to be protecting us from. Whether or not the words security and sickness are linguistically related, they are certainly cognate in a philosophical sense.
Roland Dumas and others like him should be highly commended for having to guts to say what so many others are too morally corrupt, too weak and cowardly to admit.
As the French government and its media agencies drum up hysteria for war on Syria, Roland Dumas, now in the twilight of his years, is warning people of the consequences of not understanding where Israel is leading the world. Will enough people heed the warning?
@ Wednesday, Jun. 24, 2015 – 21:42:19
Local councils have a legal duty to help certain people if they ask a council for help when they are homeless or threatened with homelessness. The help may be with providing housing or with advice and assistance to help resolve a housing problem.
If a council decides that you are legally homeless or threatened with homelessness, it may eventually have to help you by providing you with settled accommodation. If it decides you are not homeless, you aren't given the same level of help.
Who is legally classed as homeless?
You should be considered homeless if you have no home in the UK or anywhere else in the world available for you to occupy. You don't have to be sleeping on the streets to be considered homeless.
If you apply to a local council for homelessness help, the council has to look at any accommodation you have access to. In many cases, it will be easy for a council to see that you may be homeless or likely to become homeless in the near future, for example if you are a tenant being evicted from rented accommodation or a home-owner being repossessed by your mortgage lender.
The council may decide you have a home if you are:
- living with friends or family who consent to you staying and haven't asked you to leave
- you have 'home rights' giving you the right to stay in your home because you are married to or in a civil partnership with the tenant or home-owner
In many situations, if you are entitled to have a court order before you are required to leave, you won't be considered homeless until the day that bailiffs come to evict. But the council can still decide that you are 'threatened with homelessness'.
Other situations can be more complicated. The council has to look at your situation as a whole before deciding whether you are homeless. For example, even if you have accommodation that you have a legal right to live in and no one is trying to get you out, it may not be reasonable for you to stay there. This would be the case if you are experiencingviolence or abuse or harassment, or if the condition of your home is damaging your health.
Read Shelter's guide Homeless? Read this for more information on being homeless.
Can you be homeless if you have accommodation?
Even if you have somewhere to stay, a local council may still consider you to be homeless.
Examples of situations where the council should consider you to be homeless even though you have accommodation include:
- you have no home where you can live together with your immediate family
- you can only stay where you are on a very temporary basis
- you don't have permission to live where you are
- you have been locked out of home and you aren't allowed back
- you can't live at home because of violence or abuse or threats of violence or abuse, which are likely to be carried out against you or someone else in your household
- it isn't reasonable for you to stay in your home for any reason (for example, if your home is in very poor condition)
- you can't afford to stay where you are
- you live in a vehicle or boat and you have nowhere to put it
There may be other reasons why you should be considered homeless. Even if you don't fit into one of these categories you may be able to argue you are homeless because you can't stay where you are.
Get advice if you are not sure of your rights. In most cases, you should not leave your accommodation until the council accepts that you are homeless. If you do, the council may decide that you made yourself homeless intentionally.
Use Shelter's advice services directory to find a face-to-face adviser near you.
If you have no home where you and your immediate family can live together
The council should consider you to be homeless if you can't live in your accommodation with everyone who normally lives with you.
The council should also consider you to be homeless if there is someone who could be expected to live with you but who is not able to at present. For example, your accommodation could be too small or your landlord may not allow children.
If your accommodation is very temporary
The council should consider you to be homeless if you:
- only have basic shelter or accommodation of a very temporary nature such as a hostel
- are staying with friends or family temporarily but they can only put you up for a short time
If you stay in a women's refuge, in most cases you are considered to be homeless.
The council should consider you to be homeless if you don't have permission to live in the accommodation you are living in, for example because you are squatting.
You can't get into your accommodation
The council should consider you to be homeless if you are unable to get into your accommodation. This could be because your landlord or someone you live with has changed the locks and won't let you back in.
Is there a risk of violence in your home?
It is not reasonable to be expected to stay somewhere if you are experiencing violence or threats which are likely to be carried out against anyone in your household. This includesdomestic abuse or violence from people outside your home.
The council should consider you to be homeless if you are in this situation. You will be asked to provide details and dates of any violent incidents. You don't have to press charges against the violent person or provide police reports, but any evidence you can provide is helpful.
Is your accommodation in a poor condition?
If your home is of a much poorer standard than most other housing in the area, the council may consider you to be homeless because it is not reasonable for you to stay there. However, your accommodation would have to be in a very poor state of repair (for example, so bad that it is damaging your health) for this to be the case.
You can't afford to stay where you are
The council should consider you to be homeless because it is not reasonable for you to live in your accommodation if you can't afford to keep living there without depriving yourself of basic essentials such as food or heating. This also applies if you haven't got enough money to be able to return to accommodation that is still available for you.
In this situation the council may offer to pay for you to return rather than provide you with alternative accommodation.
There's nowhere to put your houseboat or caravan
The council should consider you to be homeless if you live in a moveable structure such as a houseboat or caravan and there is no place where you are allowed to keep it or live in it.
Are you classed as threatened with homelessness?
The council should consider you to be threatened with homelessness if you are likely to become homeless within 28 days. For example, this applies if your landlord gets a court order to evict you and you have to leave within 28 days.
The council should give you advice about whether you have a right to stay where you are. It may be able to help you to stay in your current home by helping you to negotiate with your landlord.
If it is unlikely that you can stop your landlord from evicting you, the council has a duty to help you as if you were already homeless. It should not wait until you are evicted before looking into your situation.
What can you do if the council decides you are not homeless?
The council has to inform you in writing if it decides that you are not homeless or threatened with homelessness.
If you are not homeless or threatened with homelessness, the council only has to give you advice and assistance about finding somewhere else to live. If you are already in emergency accommodation provided by the council, you will probably be asked to leave.
If you think the council's decision is wrong, contact a local advice centre that is independent of the council as soon as you can.
Use Shelter's advice services directory to find a face-to-face adviser near you.
You can also contact Civil Legal Advice. Their advisers can advise on the council's housing duties. You may be able to get help from their legal advisers if you qualify for legal aid. Be prepared to answer questions about your income and savings so the helpline adviser can tell you if you qualify.
An adviser may be able to:
- look into the reasons for the decision and help you work out whether you have a good chance of getting the council to change its decision
- help you put together the information you need to provide for the review
- convince the council to provide accommodation until the review is completed
- help you to appeal further if the council still refuses to help you
- help you find other emergency accommodation if the council won't accept that you are homeless
Last updated: 8 October 2014
AS OSBORNE IGNORES ADVICE ON HOW MUCH BANKS CAN BORROW, HAS THE GOVERNMENT DECIDED TO PROTECT BANK PROFITS AND BONUSES RATHER THAN PROTECT BRITAIN?
@ Wednesday, Jun. 24, 2015 – 12:17:11